Bitcoin could make money .... more democratic.
Can you explain what does this means? What the hell are "democratic money" ?
Bitcoin can reduce corruption: Bitcoin is more transparent and auditable than traditional money, which could make corruption and bribery more difficult.
This is kind of counter productive. If you cannot bribe somebody with bitcoin, then bitcoin is not money, is worthless, failed.
Can you explain what does this means? What the hell are "democratic money" ?
More democratic in the sense that everyone with a mobile phone and internet access can use it without the need for bank accounts or other traditional financial services. It is written in the article.
reply
Why is "democratic" if I have a phone and internet? What is the meaning of the word "democratic" in this sentence?
reply
It's a figure of speech. If you want to know more, you'll have to ask Clístenes.
reply
You should be aware that the words "government" and "democracy" (or anything related) tend to provoke a strong reaction from Darth. It's like they activate his dark side! 😅
reply
You are using too much the word "democracy/democratize" when it should not be there. Democracy have nothing to do with Bitcoin. Democracy is a shitcoin.
reply
Granting equal rights, opportunities, and participation to all individuals, regardless of their social status, background, or beliefs. That's what they mean with "Democratization of access to money"
Bitcoin is neutral.
Everyone can use. Everyone is equal.
reply
Democracy and democratization are not necessarly the same thing. In fact @0xbitcoiner didn't mention the word "democracy".
reply
Democratization means mob ruling, a group deciding for others, it doesn't mean equal rights. You better say "open access to money". But yeah, this word was inserted so deep into people's mind that now in their brain democracy = freedom = rights etc when in fact is not.
reply
means mob ruling, a group deciding for others, it doesn't mean equal rights.
I understand and agree with you. It is true that our modern "democracy" results in the tyranny of the majority.
However, the definition of "democratization", as I mentioned earlier, still holds true, even if it may not fully realized in our present form of democracy.