I read the FT online (via archives) too. I think they're well aware that their coverage has been consistently one sided.
I know they don't differentiate between crypto and Bitcoin but I found it interesting how this reporter last week reacted to a literal shitcoin ATM operator in one of their pieces last week (my emphasis),
Crypto ATMs are a niche but still growing area, despite whack-a-mole efforts by regulators to shut them down for being the ideal way to launder money. Operators say they help ordinary people convert fiat (real) money into and out of their crypto wallets, much like a normal cash point does with a normal bank account. One operator of machines across Europe, the aptly named Shitcoins Club, says it helps people in “bypassing the banking system”. To better understand their business model we contacted Shitcoins Club, but were told: “our company’s focus and client base do not align well with the interests of your readership, which primarily represents the traditional fiat-based financial system.” Ouch.
The crypto ATM business is somehow still booming https://archive.md/31DCn
I think reporters are fully aware that they're pushing a narrative - like all bullies they're often happy to join a fight if they feel they'll benefit and that they're on the winning side.
You're right that the paper is seen normally as a 'decent' newspaper - after all, it's said about it that wealthy readers need accuracy as their investing relies upon it.
Many nuggets of truth have been teased out from their pages because of this.
But, this is hardly ever the case in their 'Digital Currency' pieces - which often seem more like 'hit pieces' rather than reporting.
This seems likely to change when Bitcoin ETFs are rolled out though.