pull down to refresh
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitman 14 Nov 2023 \ on: My two cents on today's FT article bitcoin
I read the FT online (via archives) too. I think they're well aware that their coverage has been consistently one sided.
I know they don't differentiate between crypto and Bitcoin but I found it interesting how this reporter last week reacted to a literal shitcoin ATM operator in one of their pieces last week (my emphasis),
The crypto ATM business is somehow still booming
https://archive.md/31DCn
I think reporters are fully aware that they're pushing a narrative - like all bullies they're often happy to join a fight if they feel they'll benefit and that they're on the winning side.
You're right that the paper is seen normally as a 'decent' newspaper - after all, it's said about it that wealthy readers need accuracy as their investing relies upon it.
Many nuggets of truth have been teased out from their pages because of this.
But, this is hardly ever the case in their 'Digital Currency' pieces - which often seem more like 'hit pieces' rather than reporting.
This seems likely to change when Bitcoin ETFs are rolled out though.