I'm a third of the way through the video -- it's deeply annoying how clueless the moderator of the discussion is. So typical of academics I encounter, who have no clue about the relevant topic, they haven't read the book / paper / work of the person whose discussion they're meant to be moderating, and they even seem proud of their cluelessness:

~"Mattheus, you study something like that, I think. Or maybe you don't." Argh.

Not a criticism of the book, rather a criticism of dipshits, who are as numberless as the sands and stars. The other panelists are well-reasoned and informed, though, so the thing is worth watching.