I had to debate how to answer this question.
Personally, I didn't buy a territory. While I was thinking about whether it was worth the 100k, someone else started the territory I was interested in. So, 100k was too expensive for me, but it didn't stop someone else from making the purchase.
Ultimately, I'd say the rapid proliferation of territories indicates that 100k/month (or 3mill one time) indicates that if anything territories were underpriced.
this territory is moderated
Thanks for the perspective. Now that you believe they’re underpriced. Did you end up buying at all?
reply
"Underpriced" simply refers to the market clearing price. It has nothing to do with my own willingness to pay. That said, if @jeff ever falls behind on his mortgage payments for ~econ, I'll consider buying it at the foreclosure auction.
reply
Hahahaah love that. We’ll check out my territory ~Outdoors, I’m working on some better ideas for it. Everyone loves the great outdoors!
reply
I'll keep it in mind for the next time I do something interesting outdoors. I approve of your (relatively) high posting fee.
reply
I just changed it to 50 sats today lol.
That is actually much lower than others.
reply
I hadn't noticed that. I've seen one that is at 100 sats. Are any higher than that?
reply
I’ve seen 250. I may change it back. I’m trying to see if people think it’s fair or not.
reply
Posting costs in ~crypto is now 128 so the ones who think it's about shitcoins fund the territory. The ones who post about cryptography stuff get their sats back from me. Will see how that works out.
I'm trying to use low fees if possible to be welcoming. High fees only if necessary. But it's also an "growth hack" attempt.
Good luck
FWIW, 50 sats wouldn't stop me from posting something.