2122 sats \ 13 replies \ @benthecarman 20 Dec 2023 \ on: Do you think 100K a month is a lot for territories? polls
There's already too many territories
what do you think the optimal number of territories is today?
curious to know if you think it’s a navigation/UX problem or something else.
reply
I think it is just because the feature just launched so a bunch of people bought territories. It definitely feels like the amount of content in some of these is not worthy of its own, and thankfully that with the fee structure this is a self correcting problem.
I think the UX could use some work, having a single long list won't scale in the long run and already is pretty long. Adding a way to favorite some for now would be nice so I don't have to scroll through the list every time.
reply
makes sense, will be interesting to see how many territories get renewed next month, and whether other stackers are waiting on the sidelines to get their hands on one with some momentum.
reply
I am more in line with this thought, when you “buy” or invest in a territory there are two worlds hope for a ROI or it’s a personal interest that you care deeply about.
But if SN wants to be a Reddit-like they will need to have the sub cultures. But the pay to post will help keep the spam at bay.
reply
A territory explorer tab will fix this
reply
thankfully that with the fee structure this is a self correcting problem.
am having to learn this the hard way. ~earth getting spammed, will see how raising fee cost helps.
reply
I co-sign this message.
reply
I have a crazy idea. Maybe territories should be free, and the first poster/creater does not get to own it or receive portion of sats. Instead users nominate moderators? And moderation is transparent? This is a chance to experiment with governance. Everyone is opted in to become moderator by default. There are no specific election date. One day you will log in and find you reached the parameters for being a moderator and you and other moderators will be pinged if someone reports an item. Moderators can step down any time. And people can opt out of being moderators in the first place. Some people will probably run election campaigns. Maybe all it takes to be a moderator should be a cowboy hat. I mean let's experiment with governance.
reply
I don’t know about this one bud. Lol
reply
You think 60 is too much? Once they do updates to the user interface and make it more user friendly I don’t see an issue with unlimited amount of territories. Think of it like Reddit but better and you can earn bitcoin.
reply
I agree but there's no where near enough content to warrant all the territories so far
reply
lower your time preference
reply
im not the one spending my bitcoin!
reply