0 sats \ 3 replies \ @piecover 24 Dec 2023
When more taproot usecases? Crossinput for example
reply
479 sats \ 2 replies \ @Murch 24 Dec 2023
Cross-input signature aggregation is not a taproot usecase, it is a feature that could be built with Schnorr-style signatures. The Taproot softfork did not include this feature, because research into cross-input signature aggregation was not progressed far enough. Waiting to include it would have delayed the Taproot softfork by years.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @piecover 24 Dec 2023
Is it at the point where it's secured to be done now? I'd love to learn more about that
reply
354 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 25 Dec 2023
It’s still a research stage proposal, and implementing it will now require a new type of outputs, so it might get shipped with another proposal that requires new output types at some point
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @piecover 24 Dec 2023
Thank you!
reply