Incentivizing cowboy zapping power? 🤠⚡ (controversial topic)

satoshiplanet

@k00b @ekzyis  here is an alternative wording:

> The ranking of your item is affected by:
The amount other stackers zap your post or comment
The trust of the stacker zapping you
The time elapsed since the creation of your item
Zapping your item with more sats amplifies your trust, giving you more influence on an item's ranking. However, the relationship between sats contributed and the stackers influence on item ranking is not linear, it's logarithmic.
The effect a stacker's zap has on your item's ranking is trust*log10(total zap amount) where 10 sats = 1 vote, 100 sats = 2, 1000 sats = 3, and so on ... all values in between are valid as well.
To make this feature sybil resistant, SN now takes 10% of zaps and re-distributes them to the SN community as part of the daily rewards.

I changed the subject to "you" and "the stacker". Alternatively "the zapper" and "the zappee". Or "sender" and "recipient". I like the last one the most because it's clearer. But I guess you probably insist on the "stacker"-lingo.

