pull down to refresh

The Stupidity Quotient
Intelligence is a familiar concept. We routinely evaluate other people in terms of how we perceive their intelligence, particularly relative to other people, and we have established a notion of the Intelligence Quotient, or IQ.
[...]
In recent decades, the idea has become popular of there being multiple forms of intelligence, in addition to a general measure of intelligence. It was originally proposed in 1983 by Howard Gardner, a professor of education at Harvard University. The concept is still a matter of considerable controversy. Gardner’s list of the forms of multiple intelligences includes the following:
  • Verbal-linguistic intelligence (“word smart”)
  • Logical-mathematical intelligence (“number/reasoning smart”)
  • Visual-spatial intelligence (“picture smart”)
  • Musical-rhythmic and harmonic intelligence (“music smart”)
  • Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (“body smart”)
  • Interpersonal intelligence (“people smart”)
  • Intrapersonal intelligence (“self smart”)
  • Naturalistic intelligence (“nature smart”)
Other multiple intelligences might be identified and added to the list in the future. There is considerable attention these days to the idea of Emotional Intelligence, and a corresponding Emotional Intelligence Quotient, or EQ, has been proposed. (It is likely that emotional intelligence is closely related to Gardner’s Interpersonal intelligence).
[...]
High SQ [Stupidity Quotient] actions can occur at many different levels. Most of the time we observe these actions at the individual level. Some examples of high SQ actions include the following:
  • Texting while driving
  • Gambling with money one can’t afford to lose
  • Taking up smoking
  • Running up credit card debt without a prospect of paying it off
  • Going uninsured when exposed to significant risk
  • Taking out huge student loans in preparation for a low-paying career
  • Owning large numbers of guns
  • Putting anything on social media or the Internet in general that can be expected to embarrass one in the future (see: sexting)
  • Buying at the peak of the market and selling at the bottom
  • Doing day trading as an amateur (stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, etc.)
  • Making important decisions based on one’s sun sign horoscope in the newspaper
  • Thinking that one won’t get caught (particularly true of people in high places, such as politicians)

inspired by this comment from @kepford on this post to which I replied this:
Bitcoin has been in existence for 15 years guys. 15 years. If there ever were an example of why you need to do your own research it is bitcoin. You can not trust the authorities and experts to explain and put their stamp of approval on things. We do not have to anymore.
bitcoin is a measure for stupidity and a global marshmallow experiment
I tend to get high scores on most of those types of smarts. The exception is "music smart". It turns out that I'm musically retarded (I mean that literally, so no one take offense).
reply
what do you mean by musically retarded?
reply
There are tests designed for these different intelligences and I'm like off the charts low on "Musical-rhythmic and harmonic intelligence (“music smart”)"
reply
I don't really trust those tests, like they are standard and dead, yet we are not!
reply
There's plenty of real world confirmation for that result though.
reply
The exception is "music smart". It turns out that I'm musically retarded
Never played an instrument I guess? If so, you're missing out on a lot
I mean that literally, so no one take offense
you're inspiring mean to create another post
reply
Oh, I took music lessons for years as a kid: piano, guitar, saxophone. I'm just too musically retarded to have developed any comprehension of what I was doing. My hand-eye coordination and dexterity are sufficient to learn a song, but my timing was always poor and I had no sense for what notes would sound good together.
Relatedly, despite years of martial arts training, I have absolutely no ability to dance.
reply
Cool post bookmarked!
reply
484 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 11 Jan
"A global marshmallow experiment", you nailed it right-fucking-there, take my Sats, you lousy Stacker.
reply
14 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 10 Jan
I am surprised that no one got triggered by this yet:
High SQ [Stupidity Quotient] actions can occur at many different levels. Most of the time we observe these actions at the individual level. Some examples of high SQ actions include the following:
[...]
  • Owning large numbers of guns
reply
got triggered
large numbers of guns
I saw what you did there. :)
reply
462 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 10 Jan
Freud said that an irrational fear of guns was always because of sexual dysfunction.....
reply
deleted by author
reply
"Street smart" is just an application of general intelligence to something other than academics.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 10 Jan
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply