Alice owns a house, and Bob owns bitcoin. After learning more about the asset, Alice's willingness to pay for bitcoin increases by 2x. Is Alice poorer than she was before?
I think we'd all agree that the answer is no. Purchasing power is not a zero-sum game. If Alice and Bob agree that the purchasing power of 1 BTC is greater than it was yesterday, neither is worse off for it. Alice values Bob's bitcoin more, and Bob can more easily purchase Alice's house.
I find that too frequently, people take the perspective that bitcoin can only succeed at the destruction of value elsewhere in the economy (fiat, real estate, stocks, gold, etc.). I think this is wrong, and I think such language turns off a lot of everyday people. Bitcoin can succeed without the existing financial system falling apart, and I find that people are more receptive to bitcoin when described as a source of hope and optimism, rather than solely in terms of protection against calamity and despair.
Let's craft a more hopeful narrative. Bitcoin does not need to be treated as a zero-sum game.