pull down to refresh
171 sats \ 12 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan \ on: Stacker Saloon
~crypto territory
founded by @ekzyis
post cost 1000 sats
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/o3IuPFyyE6KS6Z_rugIlaoSio5O-r1r4rcPd-P0UfRY/rs:fit:1280:720/aHR0cHM6Ly9tLnN0YWNrZXIubmV3cy81OTYy
Rug pull started
Was waiting for this comment
I consider it to be an experiment though lol
recent is full of links about stuff I specifically mentioned in the description to not belong in ~crypto. Additionally, they are all from the same stacker even though most of them have no sats on them. 384 sats didn't hurt them I guess.
Wanted to see if 1k sats would have an impact.
reply
I've read that you pay the satoshis if the subject is cryptography, I understand the idea (preventing spam) but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.
reply
reply
wouldn't it be better, as moderator, to delete the post?
reply
No, why?
I don't mind if people value this stuff enough.
But I don't value it and I am the one who has to pay the rent for this territory. So if you want to post stuff I didn't create the territory for, fine, but you'll financially support me then at least.
If I simply outlaw it (there are no deletes), I would lose the signal in recent that maybe you should reconsider posting crypto news since you're probably just wasting your sats.
reply
good point
reply
reply
What would you do if I posted the following paper related to IOHK and the Ethereum Foundation?