reply on: Stacker Saloon \ stacker news

100 sats \ 10 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

I've read that you pay the satoshis if the subject is cryptography, I understand the idea (preventing spam) but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.

64 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 16 Jan

but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.

Wdym with this? It wasn't me and 3 - 384 is still net negative.

3 - 1000 is more net negative though.

maybe I should have waited until your edit timer ran out.

34 sats \ 8 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan

wouldn't it be better, as moderator, to delete the post?

32 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 16 Jan freebie

No, why?

I don't mind if people value this stuff enough.

But I don't value it and I am the one who has to pay the rent for this territory. So if you want to post stuff I didn't create the territory for, fine, but you'll financially support me then at least.

If I simply outlaw it (there are no deletes), I would lose the signal in recent that maybe you should reconsider posting crypto news since you're probably just wasting your sats.

33 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan

good point

16 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 16 Jan

Sats are the signal

Or in this case no sats

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan

What would you do if I posted the following paper related to IOHK and the Ethereum Foundation?

https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/107

11 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 16 Jan freebie

lol I understand this meme now:

https://m.stacker.news/12699

But joke aside. Before I answer your question, let me ask you a question:

What do you think I would do?

[0] which I hope won't be a bad precedent and invite more stackers to ask the same question before posting in ~crypto

100 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Jan

pay the cost 1000 + 10% ? :)

view replies