pull down to refresh
but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.
Wdym with this? It wasn't me and 3 - 384 is still net negative.
3 - 1000 is more net negative though.
maybe I should have waited until your edit timer ran out.
wouldn't it be better, as moderator, to delete the post?
No, why?
I don't mind if people value this stuff enough.
But I don't value it and I am the one who has to pay the rent for this territory. So if you want to post stuff I didn't create the territory for, fine, but you'll financially support me then at least.
If I simply outlaw it (there are no deletes), I would lose the signal in recent that maybe you should reconsider posting crypto news since you're probably just wasting your sats.
good point
Sats are the signal
Or in this case no sats
What would you do if I posted the following paper related to IOHK and the Ethereum Foundation?
lol I understand this meme now:
But joke aside. Before I answer your question, let me ask you a question:
What do you think I would do?
[0] which I hope won't be a bad precedent and invite more stackers to ask the same question before posting in ~crypto
pay the cost
1000 + 10% ? :)
I've read that you pay the satoshis if the subject is cryptography, I understand the idea (preventing spam) but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.