There is a quote attributed to the Dalai Lama: “Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.” What is the meaning behind this?In my recent post on ideology, I argued that ideas can be beautiful and useful, but ideology often proves counterproductive since it closes minds and hardens hearts. In being dogmatic about things—enforcing rules unthinkingly and drawing boundaries readily—we quickly lose sight of the original intent of important core ideas. We focus entirely on the “what” to the exclusion of the “why.”Of course, rules (by which I also mean laws and traditions) are often very useful and sometimes very necessary. Most of them exist for a reason, and plenty of those reasons were (and perhaps still are) perfectly good. But ultimately, rules are a means to an end, not an end unto themselves. So when we simply accept a rule without question, when we fail to delve into the original intent behind it and understand its “spirit” as well as its “letter,” we run the risk of becoming mindless servants to the rule without comprehending the beneficial purpose it was meant to embody.[...]
related posts
333 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 17 Jan
One of my fav quotes is learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist. — Pablo Picasso
reply
369 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 17 Jan
morning zap :)
And nice quote, never heard before 👀
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 17 Jan freebie
oh, that's how I see those "rules" - men made rules are rarely perfect and often time they made those rules to benefit themselves, so all you need is to learn and get more creative:)
like during the COVID time, it seems many rules out there right, but what if I told you that was one of the best times to travel?
111 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 17 Jan
Haha. Indeed.
Another take: if we don't hung up on the surface-level form of rules and rule-following, but instead consider in terms of I am trying to engineer this system to behave in the way that I want then we get a more actionable sense of what rules means: if I apply feedback of type x on schedule a, I get one result; y on b leads to another. Rules are simply a way to encode this.
Framed this way, it's a matter not of blind adherence to rule-following, but more-optimal engineering or design. Appropriate rules produce the results you want. The letter and the spirit are one, if the domain is tight.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @kurszusz 17 Jan
I think rules should be the way and not the goal.
It exist a proverb in Romanian language: " E mai benefic aplicarea legii conform spiritul legii decat conform literei legii"
This means (hopefulley I will traduce correctly) that is more better to apply the rules based on "spirit" of rules (taking in consideration the environment, circumstances, etc), than to apply "the letter of rules" (striclty the rules as written).
reply