30 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 18 Jan \ parent \ on: How do you explain zapping to non-bitcoiners? bitcoin
No
Doesn't downzapping lead to posts being outlawed (which I understand to be your posts only show up in wild west mode)?
If so, it'd be neat to experiment with letting a user know that their post violated norms of some sort.
reply
Doesn't downzapping lead to posts being outlawed (which I understand to be your posts only show up in wild west mode)?
Ah, yes. But it needs to hit a global threshold.
If so, it'd be neat to experiment with letting a user know that their post violated norms of some sort.
There is no norm. It's just individual stackers telling us that they don't like this and want to see less content like this.
You'd have to ask these stackers why they downzapped it. But just like we don't show who zapped who, we also (especially) don't want to show who downzapped who.
So anything like this would have be opt-in. But I think when we allow attaching messages to zaps, we could also allow stackers to attach messages to downzaps—if they want.
reply
there is no norm.
I wasn't thinking anything so formal, merely the "norm" that if I post an ad for some shitcoin airdrop I will probably end up getting downzapped.
I think attaching notes to downzaps is probably a bad idea. But I think letting a user see that a post or comment has been downzapped and to what extent could provide useful feedback.
I agree there isn't any norm, but SN, like every community has a culture, and there is a fuzzy edge past which people might do a thing that breaches the norm. They don't necessarily need anyone to tell them this but could benefit from a numeric visual aid to show them they are heading toward the badlands.
Also, I think they should definitely be called zonks.
reply