0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Murch 23 Jan \ parent \ on: Peter Todd proposes RBFr bitdevs
Affecting only listening nodes is less effective than affecting all nodes and broadcasting 205 kvB every few seconds at the cost of paying for 200 vB every few blocks is worse than broadcasting 404 kvB at a definitive price of paying for 50 vB.
Ok, so your comment was based on the assumption that the cycling problem isn't fixed.
If it is fixed, do you have further objections?
reply
You're departing from how we've been treating unconfirmed transactions so far. While discounting the tail of the mempool for top transactions intuitively makes plausible, instead of treating every transaction at its face value, that generally introduces new potential attack vectors. I'd like to see a more substantial exploration of that before I'd be convinced that's not a problem
reply