pull down to refresh

807 sats \ 4 replies \ @anon 25 Jan \ on: Swan Bitcoin announces US mining business, with 750 BTC mined already news
Wait someone please check my math: if I assume based on this galaxy sheet: https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/how-much-does-it-cost-to-mine-a-bitcoin/ The capex cost for "Capex Per TH Under 60 - 100 J/TH" (assuming they use something like an Antminer S19j) is $45.70
The article says they will soon be at 8 exahash which is 8,000,000 TH
$45.7 times 8 million = total capex cost of $365,600,000.00.
Can someone please explain where in the fuck Swan got $366M?
IMHO there are either key details missing or this is complete bullshit
write
preview
this territory is moderated
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @byzantine 25 Jan
bingo. this doesn't add up and don't forget the electricity cost on top of the capex build out
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 25 Jan
For sure! My math would be just capex to build the mine infrastructure. Opex (operating expense), to your point, on top of that would be huge too.
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @byzantine 25 Jan freebie
they are bigger than a public company such as SDIG
this is crazily unbelievable
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @HardMoney 26 Jan
I think the link and prices you have are outdated but it’s directionally right. They are probably buying s19xps / trying to get s21s too. These machines are 21 and 16.5 j/th respectively
Let’s assume it’s all XPs at 140TH. These machines probably cost 3-4K each assuming bulk discounts etc. At 3.5k that’s $25 per TH. Still 200M in just asic prices alone. If they are self mining theres another $50-100+ million to build the infrastructure. Based on the speed of deployment they are likely hosting with a larger public / private miner. Keeps their capex focused on miners but results in higher electricity prices and variable costs.
reply