0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Feb \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
haha, indeed :)
I think I read somewhere that good concealment is preferred over good cover but not sure. Couldn't find the source. Maybe someone with more military experience can chime in? š
I found this nice chart here though:
https://m.stacker.news/14827
good concealment is preferred over good cover
maybe that's why
- the real rich never wear fancy brands?
- the real good restaurant often hidden on street corners?
- the good men is not in social media posting selfies?
- the real travelers don't post their travel photos?
š
reply
I mean to me, it sounds quite obvious. If given the choice between not being a target at all and being a well-defended target, I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.
It's not that easy though. I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.
maybe that's why
- the real rich never wear fancy brands?
- the real good restaurant often hidden on street corners?
- the good men is not in social media posting selfies?
I also think this is related to which groups you target. So it's not only about making yourself not a target but also what is your target. Some things act as filters :)
reply
I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.
same, leave me alone!
I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.
š¤
Some things act as filters :)
many fun things can talk about in the ~security.
reply