pull down to refresh

FFS man, please go back to school

Arrhenius was almost spot on on radiative forcing in the late 1800s.

Fourier, Foote, Tyndall? I suppose those names don't ring any bells? That's all 19th century physics you get in early high school

19th century physics you get in early high school

Not in America you don't

reply

I don’t remember these names from AP Physics Mechanics or E&M

reply

Not knowing those names while trying to have a debate about climate change is like trying to debate relativity with someone who doesn't know who Einstein was

It's OK to be ignorant, but maybe be a bit more humble about it

reply

Temperature decreased from 1940 to 1970. Global cooling was all the rage in 1969

reply

It did, because of soot (the same climate science explains this). Global cooling was never a rage

Since you are the opposite of ignorant, can you predict when the world will end? When is the next catastrophe?

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

You are confusing climate change and global warming.
No one says global warming anymore because it has been effectively debunked.

Ergo, big brother has employed new speak.

Climate change lacks a coherent definition which is useful for scientifically illiterate activists.

reply

deleted by author