SN fantasy football league Opinion Poll!!
947 sats \ 9 comments \ @Public_N_M_E 12 Feb Stacker_Sports
Hello sports stackers!
Whilst we've still got NFL on our brains before we switch off for the off-season.
Would y'all mind just giving me your thoughts/interest on a Fantasy Football League?
I hope to create a friendly league suitable for players of all experiences.
NB - IDP - individual defensive players rather than Team Defence and Special Teams. Dynasty you draft your team (via auction) and then supplement annually with rookie drafts. Redraft you draft from scratch every season.
Appreciate the help. More polls to come as we narrow down into specifics.
Pub.
Dynasty non idp42.9%
Dynasty IDP14.3%
Redraft non IDP28.6%
Redraft IDP14.3%
7 votes \ poll ended
write
preview
related posts
156 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 12 Feb
Dynasty is really cool but wouldn't redraft be better for SN?
reply
50 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 12 Feb
Maybe a hybrid. We can carry our teams forward, but do something like an expansion draft when we get new users.
reply
207 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E OP 13 Feb
I thought similar. Expansion draft would be the way forward should we get new interested users.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 12 Feb
Good idea
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E OP 13 Feb
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 12 Feb
Is there anyway to do this on SN?
I don't have suggestions, but it would be great if this could add to ~Stacker_Sports.
reply
497 sats \ 2 replies \ @Public_N_M_E OP 12 Feb
Not at current I don't think. A fully working fantasy platform isn't something Devs put together overnight.
However, I do intend on running weekly game threads of stackers V stackers in head to head games. Waiver reports etc etc etc to keep as much of the league visible inside ~stacker_sports
As far as I can see the only real way to do this is have a platform like sleeper or ESPN or whatever host the league. And have all the leagues goings on posted in ~Stacker_sports like a newsletter type of thing.
I'd also use a link to the league where anyone can view the league so they can check in on their favourite stackers progress ;)
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 12 Feb
A fully working fantasy platform isn't something Devs put together overnight.
I figured that would be the case, but I remember when fantasy was done on paper and thought there might be a way to do a bare bones fantasy league here.
I can give some thought to what stripped down rules might look like, if anyone wants to pursue that. Otherwise, I'm fine with hosting the league off-site and discussing league stuff on-site.
reply
497 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E OP 12 Feb
That might be the easiest way for sure.
I'd never played on paper before, but I'm sure as a commissioner it would be a total nightmare. Which is I guess the benefit of what the platforms do.
From a dynasty perspective sleeper is by far the better platform, it has support for a practice squad unlike other platforms along with the usual ability to trade draft picks etc.
If the consensus was dynasty, I'd go sleeper I think.
reply