497 sats \ 2 replies \ @Public_N_M_E OP 12 Feb \ parent \ on: SN fantasy football league Opinion Poll!! Stacker_Sports
Not at current I don't think. A fully working fantasy platform isn't something Devs put together overnight.
However, I do intend on running weekly game threads of stackers V stackers in head to head games. Waiver reports etc etc etc to keep as much of the league visible inside ~stacker_sports
As far as I can see the only real way to do this is have a platform like sleeper or ESPN or whatever host the league. And have all the leagues goings on posted in ~Stacker_sports like a newsletter type of thing.
I'd also use a link to the league where anyone can view the league so they can check in on their favourite stackers progress ;)
A fully working fantasy platform isn't something Devs put together overnight.
I figured that would be the case, but I remember when fantasy was done on paper and thought there might be a way to do a bare bones fantasy league here.
I can give some thought to what stripped down rules might look like, if anyone wants to pursue that. Otherwise, I'm fine with hosting the league off-site and discussing league stuff on-site.
reply
That might be the easiest way for sure.
I'd never played on paper before, but I'm sure as a commissioner it would be a total nightmare. Which is I guess the benefit of what the platforms do.
From a dynasty perspective sleeper is by far the better platform, it has support for a practice squad unlike other platforms along with the usual ability to trade draft picks etc.
If the consensus was dynasty, I'd go sleeper I think.
reply