pull down to refresh
zaps forwarded to @niftynei (100%)
439 sats \ 1 reply \ @niftynei fwd 14 Feb
Lightning’s v2 era is coming!!
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 15 Feb
Waiting for 2.1
reply
1085 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 13 Feb
Carla on WBD called bitcoin protocol work "eating shit." This is what makes eating shit worth it.
reply
434 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 13 Feb
Here we go. Thanks for sharing.
reply
114 sats \ 0 replies \ @joda 13 Feb
Go Nifty!
reply
105 sats \ 3 replies \ @jonk 14 Feb
NEED ELI5.
I'm pretty techy in general, even know a bit about lightning, but my brain power is very low atm
reply
4191 sats \ 0 replies \ @niftynei fwd 14 Feb
v1 lightning channels: one side funds a transaction to make an open, funds are all on their side
v2 lightning channels (dual-funded): both sides collaborate to make a transaction, funds can be in any amount on either side. it’s basically a mini coinjoin/payjoin onchain for every lightning channel that uses it
you can multifundchannels in CLN; if every peer uses v2 opens that will let you build basically your own decentralized coinjoin that results in channel opens 😎
no coordinator, all in one tx
add in liquidity ads and you can get multiple inbound channel capacity, again all in one tx with the payment for that liquidity being just more available inbound.
it’s a huge game changer on lightning’s onchain footprint
splicing builds on this and will let you do even more complicated liquidity movements in one transaction. move liquidity between channels, fund a new channel from an existing one, etc. All in one transaction
reply
731 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitByBit21 14 Feb freebie
This might help:
reply
266 sats \ 0 replies \ @ACYK 14 Feb
https://voltage.cloud/blog/lightning-network-faq/what-are-dual-funded-lightning-channels/
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @suchat932 17 Feb freebie
ขอบคุณ