There have been some arguments against in the pull-req I linked to in this submission. I'd suggest you read those comments.

Note that at the moment, all arguments against full-RBF on the basis of protecting unconfirmed transactions are invalid: with >70% of hash power mining full-RBF, it's technically trivial to replace any transaction by simply double-spending it with a higher fee.

Okay thanks, that is one side of the argument.

Are there any articles from the other side of the argument?

lada

Arguments against full-RBF are here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28132

brandonsbytes

bitcoin

Over 70% of hash power has enabled Full-RBF; Bitcoin Core has not

petertodd

[What Full-RBF is and why you should enable it on your node](https://petertodd.org/2023/why-you-should-run-mempoolfullrbf)