So you would advocate for a point based system but have some incentive to offset potential moonshots. Interesting.
I am just spit balling.
I kind of like the thought of a pure point system where a stacker could win the pool even if they go out before the championship game.
Example: Stacker A correctly picks 16 seed in 1st round, 14 seed in the 2nd, 15 seed in the 3rd. Then picks in Incorrectly in the 4th round and is out of the pool.
vs
Stacker B correctly picks only 1 & 2 seeds and survivals till the end of the poll.
In the above example at some point I would want stacker A to win because of the much better job picking (when adjusted for risk).
Just a thought and I will participate no matter what rules are selected.
reply
I like it too but it's not really a survivor pool then. I do like it though. We might need multiple pools. Haha
reply