pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 7 replies \ @windward 22 Feb \ on: What does SN think of the Trump/NYC verdict? news
To be specific about what he's being accused of in this instance:
Properties like this were used as the basis for loans that were overvalued for what they were worth. He should not have gotten that money based on that criteria.
counterpoint:
source:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-business-law-courts-banks-lending-punishment-2ee9e509a28c24d0cda92da2f9a9b689
From your AP link:
And though the bank offered Trump lower interest rates because he had agreed to personally guarantee the loans with his own money, it’s not clear how much better the rates were because of the inflated figures. The bank never complained, and it’s unclear how much it lost, if anything. Bank officials called to testify couldn’t say for sure if Trump’s personal statement of worth had any impact on the rates.
reply
Because this was a civil case the state would only target rich people
reply
It’s a loan application. Lenders can reject your application
reply
Lenders can reject your application
An interesting question to ask is why a foreign bank would choose not to reject an obviously fraudulent application for funds by a former president.
If you or I would get in trouble for lying like this on forms, why should the president be exempt?
reply
DB is a German based bank that has a NY charter.
It’s not German collusion
reply
All lenders check the value of your assets. It’s called due diligence.
Have you ever applied for a mortgage or line of credit?
reply
No one would get in trouble unless the bank suffers damages.
The bank would reject your application if they didn’t think you could pay back a loan
reply