I'm pinning this comment because it's so good that don't want it to get lost in the shuffle.
If I had taken the time to write my own response to this post, I wouldn't have done so well.
My view on how to approach the problem is based on the same understanding of this issue. There are many factors driving this problem and some are more approachable than others. If we start by undoing some of the bad policies (minimum wage, drug prohibition, etc), that will allow some of the homelessness to dissipate. As more of those marginal cases are dealt with, it will be easier to get a clear picture of what the problem is with the remaining cases.
this territory is moderated
Yep, I agree. Also I don't think waiting for that to happen is an option. I don't live in a city. But we are involved in efforts to help those that want help. I think that many people's views on homeless are way off.
There are people that just wanna be bums and use drugs. There are also many people who are completely captive to drug addiction and want to be free of it. Very few can do this on their own. I have lost family to drug addiction. I also know people that lived on the streets, were addicted to drugs and have been able to rebuild their lives through the help of God, people, and organizations. The government is making it worse not better. Your tax dollars aren't gonna fix this.
I will caveat my strong stance on the state by saying that if I was made king the first thing I would cut would not be financial assistance to the homeless. I know enough people that it has helped. But on the whole it isn't good. Its not a solution.
reply
We're mostly talking about solutions that increase the marginal benefit of not being homeless.
Someone brought up all the "freebies" as part of the explanation. Do you see room for making homelessness more unpleasant (in some dimension) as part of a solution set? I'm certainly not proposing anything inhumane, but even just allowing private property owners to remove them might help in some cities.
reply
I am 100% in favor of removing government "freebies". I do not support handing out cash to people on the street. It enables drug abuse. I think organizations and individuals are better at deciding what is help and what is enabling self-destructive behavior. Private property rights help. There have been people that have tried to provide housing but were stopped by cities because the state doesn't respect property rights. Many of the functional problems caused by homelessness could be improved if there weren't any "public" property.
I think what these people are doing is amazing. https://mlf.org/
reply
I can't zap it now though.
reply
That's ok. You can zap this I guess. lol.
I didn't know pinning removes zapping... interesting choice of functionality.
reply
You can zap pinned posts but not comments. Yet.
reply
643 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 22 Feb
You can. If you click on the time, the comment becomes the root item and then you can zap it:
it's not ideal but it works
reply
Thanks
reply
reply
133 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 22 Feb
I am surprised no one pinged us here haha
reply
Sometimes we prefer to just bitch and moan
reply
Thanks
reply
257 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bitman 22 Feb
There's a tediously long way to zap the comment - go to kepford's bio, then posts.
Anyone know if the devs are aware of this?
reply
Interesting. Wasn't aware of the workaround. Reminds me of nostr when you can't zap a note but you can go to their bio and zap from there.
reply
I can see that I guess. I would think that if the post is by the OP it should not be able to be zapped but if it is by another then it is OK.
I'm assuming the reason is to avoid gaming zapping.
reply
Well, shit.
I thought they fixed that.
reply
No sweat.
reply
For pinned posts
reply