I'd like to publish my summaries on Substack (for free), but want them to be as correct as possible, and although I am pretty damn sure that I'd do fine, I'd like to have a few - knowledgeable - eyes proof-read the summaries before I submit them to Substack.
If y'all are okay with it, I would simply post them here, enabling everyone who cares to chime in on it; otherwise I'd simply shoot the ones who'd like to assist a few sats on SN with a link to the document in the messages-field.
I think the first option has two advantages: It's content that caters to the Bitcoin_Beginners territory, thus resulting in a somewhat steady stream of content people can interact with, and it brings in sats for the owner.
The second option would take place behind curtains, as I'd only message the content to the ones wanting to help.
Let me know what y'all would like, I'm open for both.
summaries of what?
reply
Bitcoin, how it works, why it works.
reply
oh, then that's probably very appropriate
reply
I agree that posting here makes sense, since you'll get a bunch of criticism and suggestions that you can pick and choose from. Are you looking mostly for content criticism, or also grammar and syntax stuff?
reply
All of the above and more.
English isn't my native language, and grammar isn't my strongest quality either...
reply
Minor correction then: the term you’re looking for in the title is “proofread”, as opposed to “prove-read”
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs OP 26 Feb
See, I need you, honey.
reply