21 sats \ 5 replies \ @premitive1 27 Feb \ on: deleted by author podcasts
The article does not clearly link the government grants to the production of the podcasts, in fact the author wrote, "projects that in some capacity deployed a podcast." This is an annoying argument that seems more like trying to virtue signal about social conservatism than actually detail waste of taxpayer money.
write
preview
125 sats \ 4 replies \ @brandonsbytes OP 28 Feb
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @premitive1 28 Feb
all the money came from government grants.
You state something that is not actually stated in the article, which is exactly the kind of conclusion the article wants you to reach. Where in the article does it say that any of these programs were fully government funded?
reply
1613 sats \ 2 replies \ @brandonsbytes OP 28 Feb
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @premitive1 28 Feb
I must apologize, I got confused as to where the end of the article was, and I see now that there was more to it than I first noted.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @brandonsbytes OP 28 Feb
deleted by author
reply