121 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 2 Mar \ on: Why isn't there a general Linux territory? meta
I would imagine that once the planned ability for territory owners to sell subterritories at a fee they decide (most likely, less than 100k sats) becomes available, some current territory owners will rename their territory to something more generic, and then the Linux one might become an obvious subterritory. It could probably already quite neatly fit inside ~opensource...
I own ~science. Obvious new sub-territories that I could sell at 10k sats for instance would be ~Physics, ~Biology, ~Chemistry, etc. Might even consider a ~crackpot subterritory~~
I wasn't aware of that planned feature, but if that's the case I still think that Linux should have its own territory, so distro-specific sub-territories can emerge. Let's see if we can make it happen somehow
reply