0 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 9 Mar \ parent \ on: SN Saturday Newsletter 3/9/24 meta
@anon is already excluded from anything that is related to rewards
so it would be a lift to include it in MSM since it's tightly tied to rewards
at least that would be my guess without looking at the code again
unless that is technically not possible
i like the term "technically not possible" or when people ask "is that possible?"
always reminds me how we flew to the moon with 32KB RAM
but yes, the question behind the question is often actually: "is that feasible?"
but it's a good request nonetheless, would indeed be interesting. maybe i'll take a look at the code just out of interest how (un)feasible it would be.
write
preview
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 9 Mar
lol
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 9 Mar
thank you dont spend too much on time on it it could be outside of the realm of the possible like the moon thing, lol, im sure that happened how they say it did
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Mar
i'm sure something happened lol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 9 Mar
no doubt, something did happen exactly how they said it happened no need to doubt anything
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 9 Mar
It wouldn't be difficult. We have to explicitly exclude anon as is. It's just lame to code a bunch of special cases into things.
To give anon MSM placement, we'd have to add a 65th ranking spot in case anon was ranked.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 9 Mar
we flew to the moon with 32KB RAM
You really believe the bullshit that they flew with this piece of junk thousands of km to the Moon and back?
Just look closer, even the nuts and boltz of those panels are flying around. Even kids could make a better space ship than this crap.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 9 Mar
You really believe the bullshit that they flew with this piece of junk thousands of km to the Moon and back?
So far, I do
that's only the lunar module and not the spacecraft though
reply