I went from anarcho capitalism to libertarian, as soon as I started working in manufacturing.
It simply isn't feasible. Standards must be tested and acknowledged in order to know what you buy is what you get.
Terms and condition, insurance, legal district etc are almost impossible to do without.
this territory is moderated
Standards must be tested and acknowledged in order to know what you buy is what you get.
Why do you need men with guns to accomplish this?
Terms and condition, insurance, legal district etc are almost impossible to do without.
Those sound like problems many automation-fearing careers depend on to solve.
reply
It isn't men with guns that do the testing, it's the experts, test labs etc. It's the gov job to demand what special labelling etc is needed for what type of products, it's their job to establish what defines as "biodegradable", so not everyone can just follow X conditions and results based on what they like.
There are national and international standards, all of which require a level of authority to establish and for the entire manufacturing sector to be able to comply.
And no, you can list out 50 clauses etc by default, bringing an artwork file to physical products, each with different characteristics and tolerance just aren't that simple
Even colour matching can be extremely complex across different product types.
Automation also doesn't solve cross border legal dispute, if supplier A followed their own definition of red colour and you asked for bright red, who's at fault and without a gov, are you gonna fly there and negotiate? And if your client think it should be another shade just to mess with you, what you gonna do?
I have worked at least over 20 product types, high tech to promotional merch. None of it is easy and it is ever changing.
reply
Is the discussion about what is feasible or about what is true?
If it's about feasible, the term for that is utilitarianism. Not libertarianism, voluntarism, nor anarchy.
reply