Since nostr cross posting was enabled for link posts, I've been doing a lot more of them. They don't get as much engagement, but they're a lot less work too.

Undisciplined

Controversy I’ve noticed always makes the Top 5 every week on SNL. The more controversial the better it will be received…good or bad. 

Everyone has a take to contribute…good or bad. 🤷‍♂️

This is the way of the internet not even Bitcoin fixes that. 



nah your post is fine, I mean those with big sats yet AI written like or even average content - got my alert for those fishy bots ass milking.

https://imgprxy.stacker.news/ZG3dw1e4wM3417eHitOOBfAsHSux4jAs8808ZgQ2xA0/rs:fit:2560:1440/aHR0cHM6Ly9tLnN0YWNrZXIubmV3cy8yMDI5Mw

> why? 

Because if link posts get more ignored than discussion posts, then I would think that the same sat amount on link posts is a higher signal. But not sure, also don't know if that's how I react. Was only wondering. 

> it seems quite fishy to me if a post just with a link and many sats yet without any comments.

Are you talking about [my post](https://stacker.news/items/461245)? As a cat, don't you like fishy posts? 👀

> yet without any comments

Maybe indeed too complicated but stackers be like:

> I don't understand but this looks interesting

> A link with a lot of sats might actually be more interesting than a discussion post with the same amount of sats since SN is biased towards discussion posts.

why? it seems quite fishy to me if a post just with a link and many sats yet without any comments.

Natalia

Stacker Saloon

saloon

A link with a lot of sats might actually be more interesting than a discussion post with the same amount of sats since SN is biased towards discussion posts.

But now that I said it, is this still as true as before I said it? Just like measurements can influence what you measure?

Anyway, just wanted to write something that sounds smart before writing this:

_120_