reply on: Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest \ stacker news ~meta

82 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest meta

I guess if I was optimizing for highest placement I should have run the pool out of my account.

60 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

You really should have. It was kind of a pain having to do the accounting for the in-season tournament, though, so I get why you'd rather use an account that just fully pays out.

21 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar

I see the hacker news bot is in the top 20. Do you think oracle could be in the top 3.

50 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

I was going to ask at some point if oracle was excluded. It seems like it would be, right?

21 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar

You would think so but the hacker news bot isn't so who knows.

@ek is @oracle excluded from competing in MSM?

81 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 21 Mar

No, @hn, @oracle and @nitter are not excluded.

@WeAreAllSatoshi noted the other day @hn is pretty high in the ranking for some reason. All it does is crosspost links from HN. That should give everyone who is below @hn something to think about, lol. Or it should give us something to think about our own algorithm. It is currently #19.

@oracle and @nitter are nowhere to be seen though. They are not hiding.

47 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

That should give everyone who is below @hn something to think about,

Awesome put down

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar

Thanks for clarifying