reply on: Opinionated MSM Community Feedback Summary \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

34 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 2 Apr \ on: Opinionated MSM Community Feedback Summary meta

Can I make a suggestion? Clearly management wants once monthly rewards. Why not do that without limiting winning stackers to any number? Why 64? Why 100? Everyone gets what they earn, including new stackers.

166 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 2 Apr

I think that goes into the discussion if long tail of rewards are net good or bad.

Am I right @kr?

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 2 Apr

yeah that is one concern i have.

one other consideration is the satisfaction one gets from winning something. is it as fun if literally everyone gets a trophy?

personally, i find success more rewarding when i have to work for it and when success is not certain from the beginning, but a challenge.

i think it’s important to echo the point you made in your summary @ek, the bar is pretty low to become one of the top 100 stackers as is.

i don’t know of any stackers who regularly contribute decent content and zaps and are going to miss out on rewards.

201 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 2 Apr

Clearly management wants once monthly rewards.

Just in case for the record: there hasn't been a decision made by "management" other than "let's do it again to rule out if the improvements/harms were caused by its newness."

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 2 Apr

"let's do it again to rule out if the improvements/harms were caused by its newness."

Awesome! That's the reason I've been giving everyone as to why it made a lot of sense to do it a second month.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 2 Apr

I stand corrected