@anon can zap, it's just paying a lightning invoice. 

I don't think @anon is a loophole. 

However, @anon trust score isn't meaningless. I think (might be wrong on this but don't have the time right now to look it up) zaprank is affected by the trust score of people who zap you. 

So if you were to use @anon to zap your own posts, it would only be beneficial if @anon had a good global trust score. 

I can understand there being an **Anon**, but this can lead to abuse of the anonymity that this provides and @anon trust score is meaningless.

- Maybe @anon can't zap, they can only post. No gaming the bounty's or your own posts

- To post anonymously costs 100 sats. Maybe this could be raised to make sure if you really want to post anonymously then you have to pay big. 200 / 300 sats

Just some ideas to close down the @anon loophole

0b1CoinObi

I wonder how well that works. I'm not sure how SN handles @anon 's trust score. 

Scoresby

Opinionated MSM Community Feedback Summary

> But zapping, being anonymous, is really just a "out of the goodness of my heart" kind of thing...

The zapping when you are **anonymous** is a more unscrupulous way of zapping your own posts and gaming the system, especially for bounties. Maybe **anon** can't zap when the post contains a bounty.