You're reading too much into my text. Whether it's satoshis or bitcoins, that's the fungibility. Doesn't matter if it's 1.0 or 1.0 / 100000000, my point is that Bitcoin itself is already the fungible "token".
yes, I understood. I was just using it to draw a similarity between the inventive idea of 'satoshi tokens' and ordinal theory, not in the context of fungibility.
reply