pull down to refresh
5 sats \ 10 replies \ @Lux 5 Apr 2024 \ parent \ on: 6102 order gave people less than 30 days to surrender their gold bitcoin
the constitution says "no state shall make money other than gold or silver coin", not legal tender
When America was on a gold standard, and gold was money, gold was used to discharge debts. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
reply
there's a difference between paying and discharging
money can pay
when there's no money in the system it can only be discharged
reply
ok, this doesn't seem very important
From investopedia:
Legal tender is anything recognized by law as a means to settle a public or private debt or meet a financial obligation
That's what gold was
reply
this doesn't seem very important
it makes all the difference.
a discharge doesn't cancel the debt, it just removes the charge, and for any practical purpose in a fiat system, the debt is settled.
but, lawfully speaking, it's not payed, there was no exchange of a tangible asset
we both get that fiat is a scam
legal tender vs lawful money
you should know the diff between legal and lawful
reply
I appreciate the importance of legal vs lawful, I just don't think you're using the term "legal tender" right.
I'm open to persuasion, if you want to support your usage with some sort of evidence or argument.
reply
I just don't think you're using the term "legal tender" right.
we share the same opinion :)
I thought i just gave you arguments.
legal have the force of law by contract (consent). we can agree in a contract to use anything as money, but it doesn't make it lawful money.
legal tender means that the authority you/we/anyone consented to subject decided that when legal tender is tendered for debt repayment and not accepted, the debt is discharged, if the particular contract doesn't say otherwise