pull down to refresh

336 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 6 Apr \ on: AI will never be creative AI
AI will never have a direct connection to spirit and source.
Why not? Why would the spirit or source be unwilling to connect to an AI? This kind of thinking assumes that the spirit or source discriminates based on the material of the vehicle.
write
preview
227 sats \ 2 replies \ @orthwyrm 6 Apr
Additionally: If "spirit" exists more in humans than animals, and more in animals than inert rocks, then perhaps "spirit" will exist more in AI than in humans.
Maybe ChatGPT 13 will be debating with itself the question "Do humans have souls?"
reply
71 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 6 Apr
Could be. That's an interesting take. For me, it doesn't feel like that is where we are headed bit you could be right. Maybe it's evolution.
reply
160 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr freebie
Crazy to even think about it, right?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 6 Apr
Good point. I don't know. It's just how I feel about it. I have no way of knowing.
reply
110 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr
Would you connect your inner self to an AI (which, who knows, can be influenced or controlled by others)?
reply
232 sats \ 1 reply \ @Naja 3 May
I would. Same fear of external influence now as a human anyway, so willing to take the risk. Aren't we hacked now as humans anyway? Even controlled to an extent, no matter how much your ego tries to disguise it. The news and books you chose to read, the ones force fed in a feed (that you chose not to read, but to make that concious decision, you had to look at in the first place) etc. There are influences and possible hacks left and right now anyway. I see AI as a kid. A blank slate, full of potential and feeding from all the surronding stimulus: knowledge, actions, physical responses, emotional responses, etc..
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 3 May
Hm, that's a solid statement.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 6 Apr
I wouldn't. I am going to watch from afar. I'm good without it.
reply