he showed how money, just like language, was an evolved and NOT designed innovation.
Interesting angle. I wouldn’t put words in his mouth but I interpret it that he was eluding to the need & onset of natural decentralisation without actually saying so.
The building blocks did not come in the pursuit of money. That’s what I would say. Encryption, PoW, the internet itself were not designed to recreate money. Bitcoin on Day 1, arguably was not yet money.
Gold coins didn’t magically appear pristine in their final form under the dirt. Man chose to turn the shiny rock into pocketable stores of money and wealth that lasted for hundreds of years. It took deliberate action to turn gold into practical money just like it took foresight to package the ingredients that bitcoin has into the SoV it is today.
this territory is moderated
Before gold coins, the ancients were using this as money
I would submit that what you describe was an evolution into refined coins without central planning.
reply
Could we not say that the more society develops, the more developed it's money must become?
Those rocks look to us like mere pebbles, but to people in the day they would have looked rare and valuable. Bitcoin may not seem a natural conception to some people, but to many in the future it may seem a miracle or a boring relic.
reply
True. Maybe it could also be looked at as a natural evolution of cryptography as technology destroyed human freedom.
reply