Pretty crazy to think about. No one thought it was possible a year ago.
Now here we are with absolute madness set to unleash tomorrow.
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
259 sats \ 7 replies \ @justin_shocknet 18 Apr 2024
omni layer, counter party, colored coins...
time is a flat circle
reply
0 new comment
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 19 Apr 2024
Lol if you're in bitcoin long enough you get to experience groundhog day
reply
0 new comment
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @falsefaucet 18 Apr 2024
time is circular fo sho
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr 2024
This time is different haha
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @falsefaucet 18 Apr 2024
'This time is different'
ive heard that before
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr 2024
No it isn’t. Check yourself, before you wreck yourself.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr 2024
Prepared to get rekt. Its all good.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 19 Apr 2024
It’s not all good! It’s this ignorant, immature attitude toward srs bizness that really galls me.
Do you have forced closed channels that you cannot economically save under this spam load? Do you have funds in limbo because a bunch of degenerates decided to take a shit in the public park?
I expect this kind of bullshit on other shitcoins.
This spam bullshit has made running LN infra an absolute nightmare in 2023.
This isn’t adding anything but spam and noise, and these spamming morons are just sapping value from the system.
reply
0 new comment
307 sats \ 8 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 18 Apr 2024
Runes ?
reply
0 new comment
62 sats \ 7 replies \ @nym 18 Apr 2024
Looks like it.
reply
0 new comment
90 sats \ 6 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr 2024
100 percent Runes.
Bets on how high sats per v/byte will go?
reply
0 new comment
85 sats \ 5 replies \ @nym 18 Apr 2024
90 sats v/byte for low priority
reply
0 new comment
11 sats \ 4 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr 2024
Add a zero.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 20 Apr 2024
https://m.stacker.news/27370
Halfway to your prediction already!
view all 2 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 19 Apr 2024
https://m.stacker.news/27352
I'm sure you will be correct in the longer term.
reply on another page
219 sats \ 2 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr 2024
Degens gonna degen.
reply
0 new comment
115 sats \ 1 reply \ @leaf 18 Apr 2024
People just like to graffiti. Some if it is great. Most of it is shit.
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr 2024
Art be like that.
reply
0 new comment
140 sats \ 2 replies \ @BITC0IN 18 Apr 2024
shitcoiners gonna shitcoin
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr 2024
Bitcoiners gonna bitcoin
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr 2024
Spammers going to spam.
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 19 Apr 2024
Let the great rugging of 24/25 begin and eventually get relegated to the history books only to be rebranded in 29/30 for a next rugging of even bigger proportions.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 19 Apr 2024
Question from someone who's only used LN casually and haven't dove into the full rabbit hole first, just knowledgeable of the concepts:
Is there a difference in how different LN wallets and services handle high fees?
Say custodial vs something like phoenix (splicing, single channel non-custodial) vs zeus (everything DIY) ?
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr 2024
Everyone knew it was possible 10 years ago, but they abandoned it because they are not brain dead. Stop spamming you barbarians.
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0245bdaef2 19 Apr 2024
sees man pissing into his own butt
Man: “Pretty crazy to think about. No one thought it was possible a year ago.
Now here we are with absolute madness set to unleash tomorrow.”
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 23 Apr 2024
A+ response sir lmao
https://m.stacker.news/27852
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 19 Apr 2024 freebie
That's why we can't have nice things: there'll always develop a pocket of idiots who think they've solved something amazing, while all they managed to do was the very thing people begged them not to.
One of the reasons that I simply despise humans; we can't let things be what they're supposed to be, everyone has to put their little ignorant "mark" onto something, destroying it in the end.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Apr 2024
Timers, timechain,
That fusion on timechain is way ahead, tomorrow is just a world full of better ideas.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @rtr 18 Apr 2024
So. What exactly is the point of runes and tokens? Is there anything for someone not interested in the whole NFT/DeFi crap to be excited about this?
Is this just redoing what's been done on Ethereum but on Bitcoin? What is it trying to achieve?
reply
0 new comment
63 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr 2024
Too early to tell but probably not.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @rtr 19 Apr 2024
That's a shame. I hope it doesn't bloat the txn fees too much for too long.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @notgeld 18 Apr 2024
I respect runes for simplicity and merketint but "token economy" was always possible since 10 years ago.
Nowadays better to use Liquid. It has even a DeX for them.
reply
0 new comment
205 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr 2024
If tech mattered most, Liquid would be crushing it.
reply
0 new comment