228 sats \ 8 replies \ @Lux 23 Apr \ on: COMMERCE GAME EXPOSED - How To Play AGORA
great article.
friggin love it
i'll just point what I disagree with:
- factual way to write a man's name is :john :doe
- the capitis deminutio rule tells you there's originally 3 person statuses (+ man)
- human being is not a man, it's also a person, fiction of the law (i learned the other day how it was supposedly created, the knights templar, moving trough europe, made a lot of ladies pregnant, so the ladies wanted obviously that they child gets a part of the rich knights inheritance, and this became a nuisance because all single mothers wanted the best for their child, having the right or not, so the vatican created the person known "human being" wich didn't have property (inheritance) rights)
- private person refers to state nationals; public person to us citizens employees of us corporation located in DC, over wich the president has jurisdiction (and federal employees and DC and the territories)
- by identifying with the all caps us citizen, a man becomes one by contract (but can be the user/beneficiary of it, wich is the process of taking control)
I'm learning as I go, could be wrong.
Also sometimes the details are very important, sometimes doesn't really matter.
Thanks for the clarifications, I used human being just because wanted to include everyone. Now I know it make a LOt of difference!
From my understanding:
- JHON DOE is the corporation registered under
- Jhon Doe or Jhon DOE the person, shitizen, beneficiary and responsible for the corporation s/he never knew about,
- and jhon doe the living wo/man, private person or state national (latest two are mostly used in the US)
That's why is important that, under the eyes of whatever jurisdiction, the living wo/man claim the property of JHON DOE, registered at birth with the BIRTH CONTR-ACT, that as result provide Jhon Doe with a Birth Certificate - but not and never the original unconsciously contract signed by mum and dad. As explained here #505860
reply
man this gets confusing
Capitis Deminutio from Blacks law dictionary In Roman law, A diminishing or abridgment of personality. Tills was a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications, following upon certain changes in his civil condition. It was of three kinds, enumerated as follows: Capitis diminutio maxima. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. Capitis diminutio media. A lesser or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man lost his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights. Capitis diminutio minima. Tile lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 1G, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom. Law.
Note that "family" means slaves of a household
Minima - John Doe
Media - John DOE
Maxima - JOHN DOE
Man: :john :doe
I'm not sure where state national stands, should be Minima or Media, i'm not murican
There's more to this
https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/your-living-identity.html
reply
Yes indeed, sovereign people do not have family name. Did you ever see a king signing with a family name? They simply put "King Bullshit", not John Bullshit king of crap.
The separation with the semicolon : between 2 names is when you want to express that you are from the "clan" X.
Usually when you present yourself you just say your name, like John, that's all.
reply
reply
reply