50 sats \ 7 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 23 Apr \ on: Stacker Sports- NFL Draft Contest Stacker_Sports
I can't seem to just share the photo as it's the whole first round (no idea how y'all usually do it).
I started quite trade happy but as I got further down I started to get unable to answer the question "who are they coming up for?" Even in a trade back scenario with teams, someone has to be wanting to come up, and if I couldn't answer that question, I didn't make trades.
https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/user-mock-drafts/2024/user-mock-2803060
Wow QBs for everyone in your draft. Interesting. Let’s see how it plays out.
I thought you would just screen shot the first round.
reply
https://m.stacker.news/27899https://m.stacker.news/27900https://m.stacker.news/27897https://m.stacker.news/27898
Sorry, silly mobile formatting is silly.
reply
Congrats you won with 8 correct.
reply
That draft was wild 🤯
reply
Very nice.
reply
It would have ended up messy with multiple screen shots because... Silly mobile formatting is silly.
QB Tax is real. The broncos may have traded for Wilson but Sean Payton has expressed that he likes Nix. And Penix at the raiders just seems like such a good fit I couldn't pass it up. Even if they are a little bit of a reach 🤣
reply
Trades were. (It doesn't seem to want to show trades including future picks)
MIN receives 1.03. NE receives 1.11 + 2025 1st + 2025 3rd.
CHI receives 1.05. LAC receives 1.09 + 2025 2nd.
In my head NE had several offers for the 1.03 including the Jets at 1.10 (who recently traded Zach Wilson to Denver, signalling they're probably in the market for QB) but NE preferred not to do business in division. Hence MIN got that one.
And Chicago came up because they wanted Nabers and the chargers were happy to take either WR or OT in that spot, so trading back didn't have any detrimental effect for them. Muscling out the jets who were still trying to get up to get a top 4 QB. Which is why they just went BPA with bowers at 1.10 I expect them to select rattler or someone like that in the 2nd or 3rd rounds.
reply