How Zero Gain in Marriage for Males Destroys Families.

Explaining the obvious: Why is a lock that opens with any key useless for breaking into and a key that opens any door is a master key?

1.1 Every penis a woman touches reduces her chance of being someone's perpetual wife2 - whether due to physical, mental or spiritual consequences. As Jesus made clear and repeated in John 4 (woman at the well) and when stating that there is no divorce or second chance for those who are repudiated, even without fault (Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9 - events also described in Luke 16:18) . Also Romans 7 and Corinthians 7 also make it clear that the adultery rule is gender-specific, like countless passages in the Old Testament. In addition to the Bible and statistical data, medical theory corroborates that the more sexual partners a woman has had, the less likely she is to be a good wife or mother3, due to resistance to dopamine and oxytocin.

1.2 Even having sex with your own wife before marriage reduces the chance of the union being successful4.

1.3 A male's prefrontal lobe is not ready before 30. No man is an adult before 30, nor did Jesus preach before. Do you really think you are better than Him?

The case of Christ is just a corollary, in Classical Antiquity this was already consolidated!

2 Hypergamy6 in females and polygyny in males is an ethno-biological/sociobiological fact and is confirmed in several species, in the proportion of men and women who left descendants in history and in likes on sex apps

This explains why most men didn't leave descendants and most vaginas did - and in similar proportions to likes on apps like Tinder

Accept reality or serve the devil:

3 Females look for guys above (hypergamy) and this is enhanced with the Internet, which allows them to have access to top shelf guys that they would never have in their physical social environment. This way, women can 'go out' with men 3 to 5 points higher who would never commit to them - but would accept them for free, easy and occasional sex.

This is the explanation why promiscuous women who became 'cat aunts' say that 'men are no longer good' or 'they are demanding' - those who were good were those who only used them at the top and would never commit and never had to pay more that a bill and 2 hours of motel room for using them.

3.1 What are the valuation criteria?

3.1.1 A woman's value derives from her fertility (measured by beauty and youth) and fidelity (measured by virginity and pedigree).

3.1.2 A male's value derives from his ability to provide security - material, emotional or financial. That's why there's a line to give prisoners slippers (because giving them to them guarantees physical safety, in the protection of the criminal court).

3.2 Misinformation due to confusion of criteria.

Women say that 'they are demanding' and 'there is no man of value for them' because they evaluate themselves according to masculine criteria.

Women say that 'they are demanding' and 'there is no man of value for them' because they evaluate themselves according to masculine criteria.

For men, women, being 'educated', 'independent' or having thousands of betas fawning over them is a PASSIVE because it reduces the chance of fidelity and is more exposure to betas/alphas inflating their ego and reducing their chance of being faithful (physically and mentally).

3.3) Traditional solution (Mediterranean marriage) and false solution (gigolô)

Historically, females just KEEP their value over time and just don't do shit to reproduce. On the other hand, a male gains value or he will not have access to his family. Most women left descendants and most men did not.

Therefore, the Mediterranean marriage is the most successful for MILLENNIA (females aged 14-18 looking 33-40): both peaking and declining together - and the difference ensuring financial, moral and psychological dominance of the man, avoiding competition and ensuring that both perform their roles to their fullest. Two images illustrate this didactically (graph with data from Rollo Tomassi, still considering female peak 23, while in the classics it was 14-18 and anecdotal record that women develop and lose fertility and attributes much earlier):

An 18-year-old girl who 'dates' an 18-year-old classmate (without any real long-term commitment, pregnancy or investment), loses the peak of her fidelity and fertility potential, so that in a few years she will have half her original sexual value - and he doubles - making the union unbalanced. Without any cost to leak, the tendency is for her to be exchanged for a 'new girl' without any compensation or real gain. Furthermore, do you really think that someone who can't support herself can afford it. decide alone who to marry?

Another aspect where 'educationism” (the myth that formal education would increase intelligence, wealth or productivity or would be more important than forming a family, especially for women) reduces fertility and family structuring. Having children later, fewer children are produced and intergenerational contact and support decreases with fewer grandparents or older grandparents.

There is no course or training more important than getting married early and well, whether in terms of happiness or material success. More important than a solid family is spiritual salvation, which is also facilitated by it.

An alternative to leaving at the age of 30-40 is to 'buy' a husband - actually a gigolo to pretend to be a husband. In this case, it is just prostitution and role reversal (in which both tend to get frustrated) and the contract It will only continue to be sustainable as long as the client continues to pay and the provider has no other alternative income.

4 Why does socialism destroy fertility and families?

Feminist laws, like the 15 supported by Jair, are the main cause of destruction of families and fertility.

Proof of this is the fertility in ALL socialist and Soviet countries over the last 100 years.

Female chooses whether to give, male whether to marry.

With free sex and zero gain in marriage, family ends.

5 Welfare is a machine for taking money from producers (mostly males) and giving it to parasites (mostly females).

With the State as full provider, the female does not need the male. Just see who pays more IR/INSS and who receives more than 75%

Therefore, socialism destroys fertility

6 Solutions:

The problem of the misandric bubble was already clear in 2010 and its solutions were already listed at that time

6.1 Exit of legacy men, causing fiscal erosion and collapse of corrupt institutions - which was increased with the development of Bitcoin and other cryptos.

6.2 Globalization, seeking wives or adopting children in other countries or changing residence to countries where laws are less misandrist (for example, where Sharia is properly applied).

6.3 “Adult toys” and advances in virtual reality (hence MGTOW’s fixation with artificial womb and Waifus)

6.4 Education of the game - understanding the rules of the reality of things to behave in a way that is compatible with them.

6.5 Extinction of matriarchal societies and their colonization by patriarchies, even weak ones, such as Islam - as occurs today in the Islamic colonization of Europe (articles demonstrate that even if migration stops today and there are no conversions, maintaining fertility rates, the majority of Europe will be Islamic in 2090

The last article referenced is a complete report of the causes and consequences of Western misandry, including concluding that it is the key to the 'slavery of the 21st century” expressed today by the '“you will have nothing and be happy” of the world economic forum) .

The institutional solution is BTC: “Bitcoin fixes it”.

Real money leads to real education, food and relationships. Without anything relevant in legacy, you lose nothing.

Bitcoin causes fiscal erosion, reducing parasite wealth and destroying producers.

Mircea Popescu, author who understood the misandric problem more than 10 years ago: 'Bitcoin is the most conservative thing since Jesus Christ'

In short: either accept reality, or serve the devil who is the prince of lies.

At the time of Pelopidas and Epaminondas it was already said that Sparta's fertility was insufficient due to women's excess of privileges and powers - a generation later they were obliterated by sodomite couples from Thebes. It doesn’t matter if turning away from God leads to the destruction of institutions (such as families), or vice versa, the process is cyclical “weak men produce hard times that produce strong men”.

Even among animals, experiments empirically demonstrate that when males and females lose their specific values ​​and behaviors (first death), populations tend to extinction (second death), even with an abundance of resources.