reply on: Sats For Replies: "It’s Irrational to Ignore UFOs" \ stacker news ~aliens_and

pull down to refresh

244 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 26 Apr \ on: Sats For Replies: "It’s Irrational to Ignore UFOs" aliens_and_UFOs

Didn't move the needle for me.

Parsing vague statements from the class of professional liars just isn't very meaningful. Remember when they had all seen the evidence of WMD in Iraq or the various components of the Russia collusion story? Truth is not deducible from regime statements.

60 sats \ 6 replies \ @OneOneSeven OP 26 Apr

Truth is not deducible from regime statements.

Almost all of the regime statements are things like this:

Pentagon finds 'no evidence' of alien technology in new UFO report

DOD Report Discounts Sightings of Extraterrestrial Technology

Pentagon UFO office finds 'no empirical evidence' for alien technology in new report

AARO report: No evidence of officials reverse-engineering UAPs

US not hiding aliens or UFO technology from the public, Pentagon says

Am I going crazy here? Isn't it you all who are following the regime statements and dismissing the topic?

Maybe I should transfer the territory to the Pentagon, since they know what's really going on.

127 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 26 Apr

You misunderstand my point. I don't dismiss the topic, but the video you asked us to watch relied heavily on arguments like "Look at how seriously all these serious people are taking this issue."

I reject that the group of politicians and deep state actors being referred to deserve to be taken at face value, given their track records with honesty. I also don't believe any of the DOD's statements, for the same reasons.

The point about congressman objecting to the eminent domain provision on behalf of their corporate donors was certainly interesting and suggestive, but it was also unconfirmed speculation.

60 sats \ 4 replies \ @OneOneSeven OP 26 Apr

"Look at how seriously all these serious people are taking this issue."

Fair enough, this video is more for 'no-coiners' of the UFO topic who still take governments seriously. He spends a lot of time simping for the politicians. And there's certainly no shortage of UFO people that think "We need to band together, vote for the right politicians and build a One World Government" is the answer.

Forget about the politicians, they will become irrelevant soon anyways, listen to the first hand witnesses over the last 80 years. I have no doubt that the more people start to pay attention, the more

"interesting and suggestive"

things they will begin to notice.

I have a feeling one of your main gripes is with the purported physics involved? Maybe our physics is as broken as our money is?

https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExcnI5OHRlODJqZXJkdzB1eml2d2szcW96MXJkaDQ0bHRwOTEzdm0xeSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/ChmEWOL7Vaz5u/giphy.gif

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 26 Apr

I actually find the purported physics pretty intriguing. One of my thoughts has been that these aren't really craft in the way we'd think of that, but rather they might be matter holograms.

The science of matter holograms is reasonably well understood, but they're enormously energy intensive. If those craft are being projected, that might explain the anomalous observations.

15 sats \ 2 replies \ @OneOneSeven OP 26 Apr

Are you Eric Weinstein? ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMJ4cbO88F4

117 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 26 Apr

Obviously, I can't confirm or deny that.

I've seen a few other people echo the hologram idea, but pretty much any undergraduate physics major should at least wonder if that's what's going on.

15 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven OP 26 Apr

Thanks, as always, for humoring me on this topic.