340 sats \ 3 replies \ @nerd2ninja 29 Apr \ on: SN's wallet plans meta
This makes sense for the default behavior, but can you do me a favor and for the power users among us allow a setting that tells us if the receiving end doesn't have enough inbound liquidity as to avoid our sats from being donated directly to SN instead of the intended user XD
I would be very sad to find out I just zapped someone 5k sats and they just got in store credit lol.
Hey, btw, can you add a request inbound feature to SN or something?
Also, I don't know what you're using for this interface, but I'll shill again the interface this discord mod I know made for his Bitcoin discord:
PayMeBTC-client
PayMeBTC-server
can you do me a favor and for the power users among us allow a setting that tells us is the receiving end doesn't have enough inbound liquidity as to avoid our sats from being donated directly to SN instead of the intended user
I think we don't need a setting for this, the payment will simply fail in that case. Looking at the table, I think that's also how @k00b imagined such cases?
external wallet -> external wallet will always result in sats if it results at all