They are two entirely different concept. 
https://vannormanlaw.com/rule-law-vs-rule-law/

I am not confusing civil disobedience with rioting, I am telling you in most democratic countries have its fair share of literal riot and made progress.

The idea that public disobedience would mean no rule of law, is funny, because it's often a topic of debate that civil disobedience can lead to correction to injustice in the society, including unjust law eg discrimination.  (probably too in-depth for you though, given you can't distinguish between the two)

Rule of law is rule by law. 

You are confusing rule by law with rule by men or tyrants. 

You are also confusing civil disobedience with rioting. Riots are not civil. 

1965 watts riots were an example of social decay not civil disobedience 

The French Revolution was a disaster because of the guillotine. 

Social movements don’t require chopping heads or arson or theft 


Bell_curve

Rule of Law, not rule by law. Learn the difference.

Which part of North Korea are you from? Or are you new to this world, only getting exposed to social movements? 
The US literally had a deadly riot over a beer ban, hell most democratic countries had public disobedience or riot some part of its established history.

kingzing131

alter_native

What the Campus Protesters and Their Critics Get Right and Wrong

Undisciplined

What you are advocating is anarchy and social disorder 

Some of us still want a society based on rule of law 
