It's a valid point, I am 50/50 here, it will be valid to offer `keepassxc-full` and offer by default the most secure version.

nikotsla

stackeraw

I think it would have been better if the new version with less features was packaged separately as 

 as was raised in the discussion and not as a "rugpull" by replacing the existing 

Security needs to work with user interests in mind, not against them.

security

Debian Sid No-Feature KeePassXC Package.

I think it would have been better if the new version with less features was packaged separately as `keepassxc-minimal` as was raised in the discussion and not as a "rugpull" by replacing the existing `keepassxc` package.

Security needs to work with user interests in mind, not against them.