I think it would have been better if the new version with less features was packaged separately as keepassxc-minimal as was raised in the discussion and not as a "rugpull" by replacing the existing keepassxc package.
Security needs to work with user interests in mind, not against them.
It's a valid point, I am 50/50 here, it will be valid to offer keepassxc-full and offer by default the most secure version.
reply
I agree
reply