pull down to refresh

The biggest thing people seem to misunderstand with Cashu is that it is simply a strict improvement over "custodial LN", like Alby/CoinOS/Blink/WoS. That is it. If you dont like the tradeoffs you do not have to use it.

Similarities: -rug risk! -hidden slow/fast inflation (although there are people working on addressing this)

Improvements: -privacy -individual censorship resistance -offline send/receive

I used cashu to upvote you.

reply

This is the way

reply

Alby/CoinOS/Blink/WoS have brand names, web sites and known founders. People will get to them if rugged.

Mints are all anonymous scammers.

reply

Ideally those services all run mints in the future. They can then advertise their inability to individually censor users and improved privacy, while already having an established reputation. Win-win.

reply

Better than anonyms, yes. But they will still be custodians and money transmitters in the eye of the law. They just gave their clients bearer IOUs while holding on to bitcoins. I doubt this will make a difference. Their Cashus are redeemable only back at the issuer. So may add the unlicensed securities issuance offense.

reply

Sure, but by that logic they're already custodians and money transmitters. They can't be any worse off operating as a Cashu mint.

reply

Unless cashus will be labeled securities one day.

reply

Nice breakdown. Thanks

reply

You as well! Yours was way more structured haha, I just wanted to give a tldr

reply

deleted by author

reply

Meme saved for later use

reply