69 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 14 May \ parent \ on: Only Cowboys Get Rewards: and other ideas meta
I think the reward algo is far too skewed to optimizing for top posts and comments and likely punishes for zapping and commenting on a lot of stuff rather than taking a surgical approach and just focusing on the top few posts of the day.
I understand why it is set up this way. You don’t want people spamming to just get rewards but clearly that’s not what 10, 11, 12 are doing. We are all good stackers.
Btw this is not a complaint. Just evidence that maybe the rewards system does need adjusting.
write
preview
60 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 15 May
Not saying that I am gaming the system, but I think all of us have tried different techniques to see how we go on the leadership board. I still dont understand it. lol
reply
60 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 14 May
When we were talking about it, I don't think nullcount had any comments. My guess is that he's instantly zapping a tiny amount to all the likely top posts. It's hard to believe that's enough to generate those rewards.
reply
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 14 May
Interesting.
reply
30 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 15 May
Im just curious how someone gets zapped that much. Not that it isnt right. But also, sometimes its very skewed when you look at spent, commented, and posted. What if there were different categories? Ones for commenters, posters, and stackers who spend or donate the most?
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 15 May
Remember the stacked amount includes their rewards.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 15 May
Right, that is true.
reply