Agreed. Vitalik already partly cashed out at ATHs. I honestly think that he thinks of himself as an on purpose scammer.
If he really believed in decentralization they would at least have a roadmap to giving it into the community and closing the foundation. But they do not.
I didn't have enough characters left for the comma in the title. I think proof-of-work is more resistant to bad actors, and therefore Bitcoin and ETC, if adopted by miners, will be more secure in the long run.
I wasn't commenting on the comma usage, I was asking why? You answered why only to the first of the two questions.
Q: Why won't Etheream's merge work long-term? A: I think proof-of-work is more resistant to bad actors, and therefore Bitcoin and ETC, if adopted by miners, will be more secure in the long run.
and
Q: Why are you glad ETC (Ethereum Classic?) still exists?
lol does it matter, both Eths are trending towards zero in bitcoin terms
Agreed. Vitalik already partly cashed out at ATHs. I honestly think that he thinks of himself as an on purpose scammer.
If he really believed in decentralization they would at least have a roadmap to giving it into the community and closing the foundation. But they do not.
To each sentence of both sides of the word "and" I would like to ask the question: Why?
I didn't have enough characters left for the comma in the title. I think proof-of-work is more resistant to bad actors, and therefore Bitcoin and ETC, if adopted by miners, will be more secure in the long run.
I wasn't commenting on the comma usage, I was asking why? You answered why only to the first of the two questions.
Q: Why won't Etheream's merge work long-term?
A: I think proof-of-work is more resistant to bad actors, and therefore Bitcoin and ETC, if adopted by miners, will be more secure in the long run.
and
Q: Why are you glad ETC (Ethereum Classic?) still exists?
Are you serious?
we are not interested in your shitcoins