pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @om 27 May freebie \ parent \ on: Bitcoin and Morals: a reflection on our culture. bitcoin
One could make the case that hard money in generals let's you focus on the things you like such as your own moral framework
I think this is actually all that is said. By saying that Bitcoin is Christian money Jimmy Song didn't mean "as opposed to Buddhist money" for example, for him Christianity is simply the familiar moral framework.
For example I can detect that your solution to the question of how could this happen:
Now, how does a person who's considered a philosopher, a good example of American right wing traditionalism, and a Bitcoin influencer, become FIAT AF ¹⁰ out of seemingly nowhere? Simple, he always was this kind of person,
is basically the same one that John came up with (1 John 2:19):
They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.
So I can say that your approach is similar to the Christian aproach. However I don't mean "as opposed to the Buddhist approach" because I simply have no idea what would Buddha say in this situation.
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @pakovm OP 27 May
This only proves my point, Bitcoin is not moral or immoral, it simply aligns whit people's moral frameworks, and moral frameworks are arbitrary.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @supertestnet 27 May
if moral frameworks are arbitrary then your criticisms do not make sense because that implies Breedlove did nothing wrong, he was just following a different moral framework, all of which (if you are right) are arbitrary, none better than the others
Criticism of someone or something for "bad" behavior only makes sense if some moral framework is not arbitrary
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @om 27 May
OK, when you put it like that I can agree. Wow, we actually had a reasonable conversation over the internet. What a rare sight.
reply