0 sats \ 4 replies \ @machuPikacchu 30 May \ parent \ on: The benefits of no-KYC Bitcoin | Freedom.Tech bitcoin
What is your opinion of the silent payment proposal [1] (BIP 352)? Suppose that becomes the default/preferred method of receiving bitcoin. Can that alleviate some of the concerns around exchanges tracking where the sats flow?
  1. https://gist.github.com/RubenSomsen/c43b79517e7cb701ebf77eec6dbb46b8
write
preview
110 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 30 May freebie
That is another story, is good but have nothing to do with "KYC vs non-KYC bitcoin". I will repeat: if will exist such thing, Bitcoin will cease to exist.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @itsMoro 30 May freebie
are you saying kyc on the btc protocol level vs. kyc on a govt jurisdictional level, essentially?